BNN Asia is an independent watchdog championing press freedom and journalist safety across Asia. We partner with local reporters to spotlight threats, meticulously document abuses, deliver urgent defense and support to those in danger, and build powerful cross-border alliances among journalists.
Based on direct reports from courageous journalists on the ground, Bnn Asia has released the realities by reporters and news outlets in key Asian countries during January–February 2026.
Afghanistan
In January and February 2026, press freedom in Afghanistan remained severely suppressed under Taliban rule, with the country ranked around 175th out of 180 in RSF’s 2025 World Press Freedom Index (score ~17.88/100, “very serious”). Independent journalism was heavily censored, with widespread self-censorship, bans on women’s voices/images of living beings (enforced in many provinces), and pre-approval requirements for content.
Key developments:
Domestic crackdowns: On February 28, 2026, Taliban intelligence raided and shut down Rah-e-Farda TV in Kabul, verbally abusing staff, seizing assets, and forcing it off air. Earlier, license revocations targeted multiple media/journalist organizations. No new journalist killings reported in early 2026, but arbitrary detentions, torture risks, and threats persisted, including against female journalists.
Exile risks: Exiled Afghan journalists in Pakistan faced intensified crackdowns amid border tensions (Pakistan declared “open war” February 27). RSF reported ~20 arrests since January 2026, with at least 6–9 forcibly returned to Afghanistan (risking Taliban reprisals); others detained in centers. Groups like RSF/CPJ/Bnnasia urged Pakistan to halt deportations.
Broader context: Taliban policies compelled “safe” pre-approved reporting, with surveillance by intelligence/morality police. Media outlets dwindled (many closed since 2021), economic fragility worsened by aid cuts, and violations rose (e.g., 205 in 2025 per AFJC). Women journalists faced extreme barriers, with many unemployed or silenced.
Overall, early 2026 reinforced a climate of fear, repression, and information control, with no meaningful reforms and heightened dangers for remaining/exiled journalists amid ongoing Taliban consolidation. Watchdogs called for releases, protections, and international pressure.
Bangladesh
In January and February 2026, the situation for newspapers and journalists in Bangladesh was tense and risky. Concerns over press freedom increased significantly, particularly in the period leading up to the national elections held on February 12. During this time, journalists faced physical attacks, legal harassment, and various forms of pressure.
Key Incidents and Attacks
- On January 27, at least 10 journalists were injured during clashes in Narsingdi while covering an event related to the Crime Reporters Association of Bangladesh (CRAB). The incident highlighted the professional risks faced by journalists. Human rights groups described the attack as mob violence and pointed to the lack of adequate protection from authorities.
- In February, reports emerged of retaliatory violence linked to election coverage. In several cases, journalists faced mob attacks and digital harassment, some of which were connected to political campaign activities.
Legal and Harassment Challenges
- Many journalists remained detained on charges that media organizations described as “false and harassing.” These included murder cases linked to incidents from August 2024. By late February, the Editors’ Council urged the newly elected government to withdraw these cases, stating that they obstruct journalists’ professional duties and undermine media independence.
- At least 30 journalists were arrested, and many were repeatedly denied bail, resulting in prolonged detention. Human rights organizations stated that this situation sent a “chilling message” to the press community.
- In early February, a report by Transparency International Bangladesh (TIB) revealed that 189 journalists had lost their jobs over the previous 18 months, and top-level changes had occurred in 29 media outlets. Financial vulnerability and political pressure were identified as key factors behind these developments, further increasing job insecurity among journalists.
- Allegations have also emerged that senior figures of the current ruling party were involved in this process. Changes in media ownership and participation have reportedly expanded the influence of invisible or informal power groups within the media sector.
- International watchdog ARTICLE 19 criticized the interim government’s draft ordinances for a National Media Commission and a Broadcasting Commission. Released in early February, the drafts allowed only three days for public feedback, which many observers considered rushed and flawed. Critics also noted that the proposals excluded freelance journalists from protection and could pose potential threats to freedom of expression.
Overall Assessment
Overall, this period reflected a fragile situation for press freedom in Bangladesh. Although the interim government and the government formed after the election promised to ensure media protection, in reality newspapers and journalists continued to face persistent threats, economic insecurity, and a climate of fear. Critics argue that such conditions weaken the democratic environment.
India
In January and February 2026, journalists and newspapers in India faced various forms of pressure. These included economic pressure, legal harassment, physical attacks, and self-censorship. At the same time, the concentration of media ownership in the hands of a few powerful groups and increasing political influence made the situation more complex.
Key Incidents
- Physical assaults: On January 16–17, 2026, at least four journalists were attacked by mobs while covering protests in Murshidabad district of West Bengal following the death of a migrant worker.
- Legal action: Investigative journalist Ravi Nair was sentenced to one year in prison on February 11, 2026, on charges of “defamation.” The case was related to a social media post in which he criticized the Adani Group. On February 27, Supreme Court Justice B.V. Nagarathna warned that indirect tools such as taxation, regulatory measures, and government advertising could be used to constrain independent journalism.
Other Concerns
- Although no journalists were killed in early 2026, various forms of harassment continued. For example, on January 21 several journalists in Kashmir were summoned by police for routine reporting activities.
- Economic insecurity also increased, as many media outlets became dependent on politically aligned sources of funding. This has contributed to the rise of “selective” or biased journalism in some cases.
Overall Situation
India has a vast media landscape, with more than 20,000 daily newspapers and numerous television channels. However, critics have expressed concerns about impunity for attacks on journalists, online threats (especially against women journalists), and the use of laws such as the UAPA and sedition provisions that may discourage dissent. International watchdog organizations have called for stronger protections for journalists, but in practice the environment has led many reporters to exercise caution when publishing critical coverage.
Pakistan
In January and February 2026, press freedom in Pakistan remained severely restricted. Journalists faced increased legal harassment, physical attacks, impunity for violence, and growing economic pressures.
Key Incidents
- Physical threats and attacks: According to Freedom Network Pakistan, at least five threat cases against journalists were recorded in February, with Punjab reporting the highest number. On February 12, unidentified gunmen opened fire at the home of ARY News correspondent Ihsan Khattak in Bannu, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. The attack damaged property but caused no injuries. On February 27, Dawn newspaper correspondent A. B. Arisar was assaulted and injured in Sindh while performing his professional duties.
- Legal persecution: Journalist Sohrab Barkat remained detained for several months under charges filed under the Prevention of Electronic Crimes Act (PECA) for allegedly publishing anti-state content, despite receiving partial bail. In January, an anti-terrorism court sentenced several exiled journalists and YouTubers—including Wajahat Saeed Khan and Moeed Pirzada—to life imprisonment in absentia over their alleged involvement in the 2023 protests supporting Imran Khan.
Other Pressures
- Afghan refugee journalists also faced increasing pressure. At least nine were arrested or deported, exposing them to possible retaliation from the Taliban.
- Some television channels reported satellite hacking incidents, while private media organizations struggled with salary delays.
- On February 25, international organizations CPJ, IPI,Bnnasia and RSF sent a letter to Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif urging stronger protection for journalists. They highlighted the lack of progress in the investigation of journalist Arshad Sharif’s murder, as well as concerns about surveillance and the chilling effect on independent reporting.
Overall Situation
Overall, the media environment in Pakistan during this period was marked by fear, self-censorship, and transnational repression. Media watchdog organizations argued that the government’s failure to adequately protect journalists during political and security crackdowns further weakened press freedom in the country.
Myanmar
In January and February 2026, press freedom in Myanmar remained severely suppressed under the strict control of the military junta. Independent media in the country were largely banned, and many journalists were forced to work in exile or operate clandestinely.
Key Issues
- Detained journalists: As of mid-January 2026, the Independent Press Council Myanmar (IPCM) reported that at least 27 journalists, including five women, were still in prison.
- Releases: Following events in late February, in early March 2026, at least four journalists were released as part of a mass amnesty of over 7,000 prisoners convicted under anti-terrorism laws. Those freed included Hmu Yadanar Khet Moh Moh Tun, Myat Kalay (Naing Win Tun), Than Htike Myint, and Yan Naing Soe. While watchdogs welcomed the release, they urged that the remaining detained journalists be freed as well.
- Wider repression: No journalists were killed in early 2026, but since the 2021 coup, at least seven journalists have been killed or executed. Exile media in Thailand faced funding shortages and various obstacles, while the military junta expanded propaganda efforts to counter independent reporting. Laws restricting election coverage from the late 2025 polls and internet controls continued to stifle media reporting.
- Exile and resistance areas: Many independent outlets operated from abroad. In some resistance-controlled zones, limited media restrictions were imposed under security pretexts, according to February reports from Athan.
Overall Situation
Overall, Myanmar’s media environment remained dominated by fear, self-censorship, and restricted information flow.
Taiwan
In early 2026, Taiwan maintained its strong position for press freedom, ranking first in East Asia and second in the Asia-Pacific, supported by robust democratic institutions, journalist safety, and legal protections. No journalists were killed, attacked, or broadly detained during this period.
A notable case occurred on January 17–18, when CTi News reporter Lin Chen-you (林宸佑) and five active-duty or retired military personnel were detained by Ciaotou District Prosecutors for alleged violations of national security laws. Lin was accused of bribing service members to leak military information to “Chinese individuals.” The case, under the National Security and Anti-Corruption Acts, was framed as a national security matter rather than press suppression.
Taiwan’s media landscape remained politically polarized, with sensationalism, profit-driven reporting, and low public trust (~33%). Chinese disinformation and AI-driven influence persisted. However, Taiwan hosted 12 groups of foreign journalists in 2026, highlighting strong press freedoms. Overall, independent journalism thrived, with minimal direct threats, though geopolitical and domestic pressures posed indirect challenges.
South Korea
In early 2026, South Korea’s press freedom environment remained free of direct violence, with no journalists reported killed, attacked, or newly detained. However, the period was dominated by intense political polarization, government criticism of “oppositional” media outlets, and widespread backlash against the controversial anti-fake news law.
Signed by President Lee Jae-myung in late 2025, the revised Information and Communications Network Act introduced punitive damages—up to five times actual losses—for spreading “false, manipulated, or illegal information” with intent to harm or gain illicit benefits. Although enforcement begins in July 2026, January–February debates drew sharp international condemnation from UNESCO, the US government, and the International Press Institute, who warned of vague definitions enabling censorship, self-censorship, and threats to watchdog journalism.
Domestic critics feared it could suppress critical coverage of officials and corporations, while supporters viewed it as necessary to combat harmful disinformation. President Lee and aides publicly rebuked certain TV networks for biased or low-quality political reporting, deepening media distrust amid ongoing economic challenges.
Despite these pressures, South Korea retained a vibrant, diverse media landscape with strong overall legal safeguards—though criminal defamation persists as a potential tool for influence. International watchdogs called for repeal or revision to protect media autonomy in this polarized context.
Saudi Arabia
Independent media were non-existent, and all outlets adhered to strict government guidelines, fostering pervasive self-censorship and surveillance.
Key developments:
Arrests and detentions: Saudi authorities arrested television and YouTube program host Mohamed El-Sayed in December 2025 (details emerged January 29, 2026), with no official explanation, charges, family contact, or legal access reported. 19 journalists remained imprisoned as of early 2026, following the June 2025 execution of journalist Turki al-Jasser for exposing corruption.
Broader repression: No journalists were killed or physically attacked in this period, but ongoing issues included enforced disappearances, torture risks, and harsh sentences for online expression. Internet freedom scored low (25/100 per Freedom House 2025 report), with extensive censorship, surveillance, and persecution for government criticism.
Context: Traditional press usage was minimal (only 2% of Saudis relied on it for news per a 2025 report), with social media dominating amid heavy online controls.
Overall, early 2026 saw continued crackdowns on critical voices through opaque detentions and legal tools, maintaining Saudi Arabia as one of the world’s most dangerous places for independent journalism.
Syria
Positive steps: Consultative meetings (e.g., Syrian Journalists Union, February 10; SCM sessions, late January) discussed media reforms, decriminalizing offenses, and sustainability. Exiled journalists returned to Damascus, founding new outlets or joining state media transitions.
Challenges and incidents:
– January 12: Government forces detained three journalists (including Rudaw TV’s Vivyan Fetah) and restricted reporting in recaptured Aleppo areas (Sheikh Maqsoud/Ashrafiyah) amid SDF clashes; most released quickly.
– February 21: Journalist Alaa Mohammed found dead at home in Lattakia; Called for transparent investigation .
– February 7–8: Syrian Journalists Association rejected the Ministry of Information’s new “Professional and Ethical Code of Conduct” (launch planned February 15) as violating media independence and the Transitional Constitutional Declaration.
Broader context: Fragile freedoms persisted amid instability, economic pressures, hate speech risks (especially against minorities/North-East Syria), and self-censorship. Northeastern Kurdish areas (SDF) saw ongoing detentions (e.g., call for release of a Raqqa journalist arrested December 2025).
Overall, early 2026 offered historic openings for journalism post-dictatorship, but uncertainty, security gaps, and government overreach risked backsliding, with calls for genuine reforms to secure independent media.
Sri Lanka
No journalists were killed or detained in early 2026 and physical attacks were absent, but pressures focused on investigative and critical reporting.
Key developments:
Police summons and crackdowns: In late December 2025–early February 2026, investigative journalist Tharindu Jayawardena (HRCSL Freedom of Expression Sub-Committee member) was unlawfully summoned by Gampola Police over alleged defamation in reporting on corruption at Ambuluwawa Biodiversity Complex. The Human Rights Commission of Sri Lanka (HRCSL, February 3 statement) condemned it as a breach of procedures and misuse of police powers for defamation (a civil matter since 2002). IFJ and affiliates (February 6) called it part of intensified media suppression.
Media outlet pressure: Police requested revocation of Hiru Media Network’s broadcasting license (late December 2025) over coverage of a cannabis raid and alleged police misconduct tied to NPP-linked figures; the network rejected it as a threat to independence.
Broader issues: Ongoing impunity for historical killings (e.g., Lasantha Wickrematunge, Prageeth Eknaligoda) persisted, with a January 18 report by Journalists for Democracy in Sri Lanka noting 44 journalists/media workers killed/disappeared over decades, mostly unpunished. Laws like the ICCPR Act, PTA, and Online Safety Act enabled harassment of critical voices, especially in north/east Tamil areas. HRCSL warned of growing threats to expression via police overreach on “defamatory” speech.
Context: A diverse media landscape existed (state-dominated outlets like SLBC, Rupavahini lacked independence), but political.
Overall, early 2026 featured no violence but rising legal/police intimidation against independent journalism, particularly corruption probes, fostering self-censorship in a transitional yet fragile environment.
Qatar
In January and February 2026, no journalists reported killed, attacked, detained, or expelled by authorities.
No major incidents targeted professional journalists or domestic media outlets during this period. However, covering sensitive domestic political issues stayed challenging due to widespread self-censorship, strict cybercrime laws, censorship of criticism toward the ruling family, and an overall restrictive legislative framework—though overt repression was milder than in neighboring countries.
Authorities prioritized online content regulation. In early March 2026 (just after February), the Ministry of Interior arrested 194 individuals of various nationalities for sharing misleading videos, rumors, and content inciting public opinion amid unspecified “field developments.” Separately, one person was detained on March 7 for social media posts insulting the state, armed forces, and Gulf countries. These actions focused on misinformation rather than traditional journalism.
Qatar’s media landscape included internationally oriented Al Jazeera and local outlets like The Peninsula and Gulf Times, enjoying greater freedom for non-political reporting. Economic stability bolstered the sector, positioning the country as a regional media hub. Watchdogs such as RSF commended progress but noted persistent self-censorship on internal affairs and risks from vague laws.
Overall, early 2026 offered journalists a low-threat environment—sharply contrasting regional declines—yet structural barriers to critical domestic coverage remained.
United Arab Emirates (UAE)
No major new journalist arrests tied to traditional media emerged in this period, but expatriate or independent voices risked harassment/extradition. The National Media Council continued regulating content, blocking criticism of government or “social cohesion” threats.
Most media outlets were state-linked or government-tied, with heavy interference in editorial decisions Internet freedom scored low (Freedom House 2025: “Not Free,” score 28/100), with surveillance, content blocks, and penalties for dissent. Human rights groups highlighted a gap between reform rhetoric and reality, including new laws like the January 2026 Child Digital Safety Decree imposing monitoring on platforms.
Malaysia
In January and February 2026, press freedom in Malaysia remained constrained despite constitutional guarantees. Draconian laws—including the Sedition Act 1948, Penal Code, Communications and Multimedia Act (CMA) 1998, and Official Secrets Act—continued to restrict critical reporting through self-censorship and legal intimidation.
Key incidents included the overnight detention of journalist Rex Tan on January 17 under the Sedition Act, Penal Code Section 505(c), and CMA Section 233 for a question at a public lecture; he was released on bail amid widespread condemnation. The MMC highlighted doxxing and harassment, while a female reporter alleged assault by a government-linked CEO. On February 26, the Federal Court upheld key CMA provisions as constitutional, drawing criticism from ARTICLE 19. Anti-corruption chief Azam Baki filed a $25 million defamation suit against Bloomberg.
No journalists were killed, physically attacked (beyond isolated claims), or long-term detained . Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim signaled openness to law review and media self-regulation on February 4.Overall, early 2026 saw no widespread violence but persistent legal pressures and SLAPP-style suits, with watchdogs urging repeal of repressive laws to match reform promises and vibrant civil society resistance.
Nepal
In January–February 2026, Nepal’s press freedom remained under pressure ahead of the March 5 federal elections. No journalists were killed or detained, but physical attacks and threats rose during election coverage.
Notable incidents:
– Feb 26: Arjun Acharya (RatoPati) assaulted in Jhapa while covering UML leader K.P. Sharma Oli.
– Feb 28: Sudeep Thapa (Sunrisetvnews) attacked in Kailali, injuring eye and head.
– Feb 27: Publisher Raju Subedi (Tvannapurna) received death threats over citizenship reporting.
The Election Commission tried to censor a BBC documentary (Feb 26–27). Impunity, self-censorship, and election-related hostility persisted, despite a diverse media landscape. Watchdogs urged better protection for journalists.
Japan
The lowest among G7 nations despite a slight improvement from prior years. No major incidents domestically. self-censorship continued due to government and corporate pressure on mainstream outlets (e.g., NHK and major dailies like Asahi Shimbun, Yomiuri). Topics like corruption, pollution, or sensitive issues faced indirect influence via access restrictions, the entrenched “kisha” (press club) system limiting freelancers/foreign reporters, and reduced invitations to official briefings. Nationalist online harassment occasionally targeted critical journalists. A vibrant, competitive media landscape existed with strong constitutional protections, no blocks on content, and active coverage of domestic politics.
Thailand
In January–February 2026, press freedom in Thailand ranked highest in ASEAN but faced ongoing legal and security threats. No journalists were killed or physically attacked, though challenges intensified around the February 8 general election and constitutional referendum.
Key issues:
Women journalists endured online harassment, intimidation, and threats while covering election rallies (Jan 15–23), with persistent impunity for past attacks creating a chilling effect.
The lèse-majesté law (Article 112) remained a looming risk. On February 27, the Thai Journalists Association demanded the Election Commission drop conspiracy charges against a SPACEBAR photographer arrested for photographing ballots during a February 22 Bangkok re-vote, citing threats to election transparency.
Context: A vibrant media scene existed, but self-censorship stemmed from royalist/military influence, oligarchic ownership, and restrictive laws. No widespread detentions occurred, yet sensitive political coverage carried clear risks.
Philippines
In January and February 2026, the Philippines remained hazardous for journalists due to legal harassment, red-tagging, and impunity for past killings, though no new journalist murders were reported.
Key developments:
– On January 22, community journalist Frenchie Mae Cumpio was convicted of terrorism financing and sentenced to 12–18 years in prison. Critics, including over 90 press groups (February 6 letter to President Marcos), RSF, and CPJ, condemned the case as retaliatory criminalization of her investigative work on abuses; she had been detained since February 2020.
– Journalist Erwin “Ambo” Delilan was arrested at home on January 19, sparking fresh concerns. On February 12, the military exposed another journalist to potential harassment (NUJP). Palace press officer Claire Castro reported death threats from pro-Duterte vloggers in January.
– During National Press Week (February 8–14), the Commission on Human Rights urged stronger protections against intimidation, surveillance, and misuse of anti-terrorism laws. President Marcos reaffirmed respect for editorial independence (February 2), but critics noted persistent gaps.
Broader context: No widespread physical attacks occurred, yet systemic threats—red-tagging, prolonged detentions, and weak accountability—continued. Watchdogs called for decriminalizing libel, ending terror-tagging of media, and addressing impunity.
Overall, early 2026 saw legal pressures and advocacy for detained journalists dominate, with civil society and international groups pushing for reforms in a vibrant yet challenged media environment.
China
In January and February 2026, China remained the world’s largest jailer of journalists (around 110 detained), with pervasive state censorship, self-censorship, the Great Firewall, and tight media regulation under CCP control.
Key developments:
- On February 1, veteran investigative reporter Liu Hu (50) and photojournalist Wu Yingjiao (34) were detained in Chengdu, Sichuan, on charges of “making false accusations” and “illegal business operations.” The arrests followed their January 29 WeChat exposé of alleged corruption by Pujiang County Party Secretary Pu Fayou (article deleted). RSF, CPJ, and others condemned the detentions as retaliatory against independent journalism.
- RSF highlighted (February 12–13) China National Radio’s rapid expansion of Tibetan-language propaganda programs (from 1 to 17 in under a year), amid bans on private satellite TV and forced government-installed receivers in Tibetan areas.
Broader context: No journalists were killed or physically attacked (RSF: 0 since January 1). Vague laws (e.g., updated Cybersecurity Law effective January 1), mass surveillance, and “positive energy” mandates enforced ideological conformity. Independent voices survived only underground or in exile; state media (Xinhua, CCTV) dominated entirely.
Overall, early 2026 deepened authoritarian grip on information, with minimal domestic pushback against the Liu/Wu case illustrating the severely narrowed space for critical reporting under Xi Jinping.
North Korea
No independent journalism existed; all media were state-controlled propaganda tools under Kim Jong Un’s totalitarian regime.The Korean Central News Agency (KCNA) served as the sole official mouthpiece. Unsanctioned phones, computers, TVs, radios, and foreign media were illegal, with distribution of banned content (especially South Korean-influenced) punishable by death or forced labor. Authorities intensified crackdowns on cross-border Chinese mobile use and smuggled media.Human Rights Watch’s World Report 2026 (February 4 release) highlighted expanded surveillance, information controls, and border crackdowns in 2025, continuing into 2026 amid food insecurity and isolation. Reduced U.S./South Korean-funded foreign broadcasts left North Koreans reliant on state propaganda.
Cambodia
In January–February 2026, press freedom in Cambodia remained heavily restricted, with independent media scarce and most outlets self-censoring or state-aligned amid legal intimidation and arrests tied to sensitive reporting.
Key incidents:
- At least six journalists were detained, arrested, or charged with incitement and related offenses (per CamboJA, LICADHO, ADHOC), often linked to border tensions with Thailand and suspected scam compounds.
- Feb 3: Hem Vanna arrested in Poipet after reporting on a suspected scam compound.
- Feb 13: Luot Sophal arrested in Oddar Meanchey for reporting troop water shortages; charged with “demoralizing the army” and incitement.
- Feb 20–21: Online journalists Pheap Phara and Phon Sopheap each sentenced to 14 years for treason over border conflict coverage; IFJ condemned misuse of sedition/treason laws.
Context: No journalists killed, but persistent harassment, summonses, new press card restrictions, and impunity for past attacks continued. Independent outlets faced closures and funding cuts.
Overall, early 2026 saw intensified legal crackdowns on border and military-related reporting, further weakening Cambodia’s fragile press environment.
Thanks.
For more Information
Contact:
BNN Asia Secretariat
E-mail : secretariat@bnnasia.org
Website: bnnasia.org